OK, so we are doing our best to reduce food waste, but what about the packaging it comes in?
It would be nice to think that we can do without packaging that goes into the bin & then landfill, but there is a trade off. If it takes more resources to produce food that would otherwise be wasted than the packaging required extending its life, then there is an arguable case.
According to Incpen (Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment), more resources go into producing food than into the packaging which protects it and without the protection of packaging there would be much more food wasted.“The government’s own Waste Policy Review 2011 acknowledges that packaging fulfils an important role in avoiding spoilage in the supply system and in the home,” said Incpen director Jane Bickerstaffe. “It also says that the carbon footprint of packaging is dwarfed by that of the products it contains. Both industry and government need to help consumers understand that.”
Typical examples are:
- plastic wrapped cucumbers (stops them rotting so they last 5 times longer)
- Pre-packed meat & fish (contains an artificial atmosphere that prevents bacterial growth)
- Trays or bags have reduced in-store waste of grapes by 20%.
- In-store wastage of new potatoes reduced from 3% when sold loose to less than 1% after specially designed bags were introduced.
Meanwhile, of the total energy used in the food chain, 50% is used in food production, 10% on transport to the shops and retailing, 10% to make the packaging and the remaining 30% is used by shoppers to drive to the shops and store and cook food.
No comments:
Post a Comment